Standard Compression Scheme for Unicode
| Unicode series |
| Unicode
|
| UCS |
| UTF-7 |
| UTF-8 |
| UTF-16 |
| UTF-32 |
| SCSU |
| Punycode
|
| Bi-directional text |
| BOM |
| Han unification |
| Unicode and HTML |
SCSU is not a resounding success. Few places need to compress enough Unicode text to make it worth using a poorly supported compression scheme. Treated purely as a compression format, it's inferior to most commonly used compression programs for texts over a few kilobytes. It can be used as a text encoding, but it's very hard to handle internally, and the percentage savings between SCSU and UTF-16 or UTF-8 drops after external compression, dramatically in the case of bzip2 and other modern compression schemes. It does have the advantage that SCSU can compress texts that are only a few characters long, whereas most full-scale compressors need a few kilobytes of data to overcome the overhead.
Reuters, the organization that floated the first draft of SCSU, is believed to use SCSU internally.